Study of the Behaviour of Concrete Filled Steel Tube Column and Fully Encased Composite Column on A G+10 Storey Special Moment Frame

  • Mohammed Thousiff S Department of Civil Engineering, Sri Shakthi Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
Keywords: CFST, Fully encased column, Storey drift, ETABS

Abstract

One of the main problems with a G+10 Storey Special Moment Frame is its vulnerability to progressive collapse. In India fortified solid structures are generally utilized since this is the most advantageous and monetary framework for low-ascent structures. The RCC Structure is not, at this point reasonable due to the expanded dead burden, range dismissal and less solidness. There is extraordinary potential for expanding volume of steel in development. The level of steel can be expanded with the utilization of steel-solid composite segments. The undertaking presents the impact of Conventional RCC, CFST (Concrete filled Steel Tube) and Fully Encased Composite segment on a G+ 10 story extraordinary second casing. In this task three distinct structures are considered for the correlation under seismic examination. The direct static examination, for example "Identical seismic coefficient investigation" are accomplished for G+10 story structure. To correlate the behaviour of structure for seismic load, a simulation model is developed using ETAB software. Results are generated for the Self weight, Story Drift, Story Shear, Lateral burden appropriation, Base shear, Story dislodging and story float for all the three structures. As the composite is having more horizontal firmness, lesser decrease in self- weight, the base shear, and the sidelong burden appropriation along the story shows the huge variation such that Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular (CFST) and Encased Column models demonstrate a notable reduction in self-weight by 11.2% and 4.45%, respectively, compared to RCC columns.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

S. B. Cholekar, S.M. Basavalingappa, Comparative analysis of multistoried RCC and Composite building due to mass irregularity. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2(4), (2015) 603-608.

M.N.A. Mohite, M.P. Joshi, D.W. Deulkar, Comparative Analysis of RCC and Steel-Concrete-Composite (B+ G+ 11 Storey) Building. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(10), (2015) 1-6.

K. Shashikala, S.V. Itti, Comparative study of RCC and composite multi-storeyed buildings. International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT), 3, (2013).

D.R. Panchal, P.M. Marathe, (2011) Comparative Study of RCC, steel and composite (G+ 30 storey) building. Nirma University, Ahmedabad, India.

P. Sangave, N. Madur, S. Waghmare, R. Shete, V. Mankondi Comparative study of Analysis and design of R.C. and Steel Structures. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 6(2), (2015) 256-267.

C.V.R. Murty, R. Goswami, A.R. Vijayanarayanan, V. Mehta, Earthquake behaviour of buildings. Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority, Gandhinagar, 53, (2012) 79.

R. Goswami, C.V.R. Murthy, A.R. Vijayanarayanan, V.V. Mehta, (2012) Some concepts in earthquake behavior of buildings. Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority, Government of Gujarat.

Indian Standard 1893-1 (2002) Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Part 1: General Provisions and Buildings, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

Indian Standard 4326 (1993) Code of practice for Earthquake Resistant Design -and Construction of buildings- Code of Practice, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

Indian Standard 875(Part – 1) – 1987 (Dead load). Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake). For Building and Structures. Part-1: Dead Load- unit weight of building materials and stored materials, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

Indian Standard 875(Part –2) (1987) (Imposed load). Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake). For Building and Structures. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

Indian Standard 875 (Part –3) (1987) (Wind loads).Indian Standard Code of Practice for Design Loads (other than earthquake for Buildings and Structures, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

Indian Standard 800 – 2007 General Construction in Steel – Code of Practice (Third Revision), Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

Published
2024-12-08
How to Cite
(1)
S, M. T. Study of the Behaviour of Concrete Filled Steel Tube Column and Fully Encased Composite Column on A G+10 Storey Special Moment Frame. ijceae 2024, 6, 27-42.
Section
Articles



Views: Abstract : 8 | PDF : 3

Plum Analytics